A workers compensation claim can become more difficult when the injury report does not clearly explain when, where, and how the accident occurred. This is particularly important with hand, wrist, and finger injuries because pain, weakness, or loss of coordination may develop gradually after the initial event. An insurer may question whether the condition came […]
An employer or the Industrial Commission may require a medical examination during a North Carolina workers’ compensation claim. The examination can address diagnosis, causation, treatment, restrictions, work capacity, prognosis, or impairment, depending on the notice and dispute.
An independent medical examination is an evaluation requested by the employer or ordered by the Industrial Commission; it is not ordinary treatment and it does not automatically replace the authorized treating provider.
Read the examination notice against G.S. 97-27
G.S. 97-27(a) requires an employee claiming compensation to submit to independent medical examinations at reasonable times and places when requested by the employer or ordered by the Commission. The examining physician must be qualified, licensed and practicing in North Carolina, and designated and paid by the employer or Commission.
- Confirm the requesting party, statutory basis, examiner, specialty, office, date, time, travel, interpreter, and anticipated duration
- Ask what body parts, conditions, medical questions, testing, records, imaging, job information, surveillance, or other materials will be provided
- Compare the examination scope with the accepted claim, disputed conditions, current treatment, restrictions, and pending issues
- Preserve the notice, scheduling messages, travel record, submitted documents, attendance, examination events, and later report
Know the examination-specific communication rules
G.S. 97-27(a) allows the employer or its agent to communicate openly with an employer-chosen independent medical examiner. If that examiner physically examines the worker, the employer must provide the examiner’s report within 10 business days after receiving it, along with the documents and written communications sent to the examiner about the employee.
That rule differs from communications with an authorized treating provider. G.S. 97-25.6 sets separate procedures for relevant records, written questions, oral communications, and additional information involving authorized providers.
Prepare an accurate medical and work history
- Create a chronology of the work event or exposure, symptom onset, each diagnosis, treatment, response, restriction, and return attempt
- List prior injuries, symptoms, treatment, imaging, health conditions, later events, and other possible causes accurately
- Bring requested identification, medication information, assistive devices, and records only as directed; keep a copy of everything supplied
- Describe symptoms, function, work demands, and limits specifically without guessing or minimizing
- Record the time, participants, history taken, physical testing, imaging, instructions, and any event that needs prompt correction
A physician may attend for the employee
The statute gives the injured employee the right to have a physician present at the examination when that physician is provided and paid by the employee. Whether that is useful depends on the examination, medical issue, scheduling, cost, and available provider.
Do not ignore or obstruct the request
G.S. 97-27(a)(5) provides that refusal or obstruction can suspend compensation and the ability to prosecute proceedings until the issue ceases, unless the Commission finds the circumstances justified. A concern about timing, distance, specialty, scope, testing, health risk, accessibility, or another condition should be raised precisely and promptly rather than handled through a silent nonappearance.
Review the report as evidence, not as the final decision
Compare the examiner’s history, records, assumptions, findings, diagnosis, causation opinion, treatment recommendation, restrictions, work-capacity opinion, prognosis, and impairment with the source record. Identify factual omissions or conflicts and determine what treating-provider, documentary, vocational, or other evidence is needed. The Commission decides contested issues from the record; the examiner does not decide the claim.
The related medical-deposition guide explains how provider roles, records, opinion foundations, contrary facts, and transcripts can become part of a contested Commission record.
Rosensteel Fleishman Car Accident & Injury Lawyers provides information about consulting a Charlotte workers’ compensation lawyer about an independent medical examination. The review should occur early enough to address the notice, scope, records, logistics, and response plan.
Sources
Additional Workers Compensation Articles
A workplace fall-hazard review starts with the route and task, then separates surface conditions, access, interim protection, corrective action, and training. This is general safety information for general-industry workplaces. It does not diagnose a worker, decide whether a standard applies to a particular task, or determine fault, benefits, or claim outcomes. Map the route and […]
Discharge from a hospital, rehabilitation program, therapy course, or other treatment setting does not necessarily mean an employee can resume every prior task. A safe transition requires written clinical instructions and an accurate comparison with the actual job. A discharge plan should convert clinical status into a safe and traceable transition: current diagnoses, medication, equipment, […]
How can simple breathing habits affect the way a workplace injury claim moves forward? When someone is recovering from an injury at work, stress can build quickly, especially when medical updates, employer communication, wage concerns, and insurance questions all seem to happen at once. Breathing techniques workplace recovery can be a practical part of staying […]