Car accidents can be overwhelming and stressful, and it is important to be aware of the things that could jeopardize your car accident claim. “There are many ways you can inadvertently harm your case after an accident,” advises Matt Fleishman, an attorney with Rosensteel Fleishman, PLLC. Here are some tips to remember if you are […]
North Carolina’s Body Camera Footage Laws
North Carolina’s Disclosure of Body Cam Footage Laws
Transparency in law enforcement is at the forefront of public policy issues now more than ever. Disclosing body cam footage worn by law enforcement is at the center of it all. Does the government’s need to closely guard the use of force and the conduct of its officers during active investigations offset the public’s right to hold law enforcement accountable for their actions? How can the public hold law enforcement accountable for excessive force, abuse of power, or misconduct when the public cannot have access to information?
In recent years questions of police brutality and misconduct have dominated the headlines, and much of it was captured on body cam footage worn by law enforcement officers. Merely mentioning places like Ferguson, MO; Chicago, IL; Cleveland, OH; Baltimore, MD; North Charleston, SC; and Baton Rouge, LA summons tragic images of police encounters which have led to the deaths of those who were the subject of the stories and video footage.
Last year in Baltimore, MD, three cases of police misconduct were captured on body cam footage. In one instance, police officers were caught planting fake evidence at a crime scene. After the footage was reviewed by the public defender, the charges were dropped, and the suspect was released from jail, but not before being locked-up for several months. In another instance, body cam footage caught other officers planting evidence during a traffic stop. “Prosecutors have dropped at least 40 criminal cases following the release of the two sets of footage (NPR). More than 50 other cases are being reviewed, the state’s attorney’s office in Baltimore told CNN. The public defender’s office told NPR hundreds of other cases were “at risk of being tossed out” (pbs.org).
More and more law enforcement agencies have mandated the use of body cams, but there is no uniform law regarding the public’s right to access body cam footage. The laws regarding public access to government records differ from state to state, and each state’s standard for releasing body cam footage varies. The federal government has its own laws regarding the release of information under the control of the federal government and can be found under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552.
The Skinny: From HB 972 to N.C.G.S. 132-1.4A
HB 972 proposed in part:
AN ACT TO PROVIDE THAT RECORDINGS MADE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ARE NOT PUBLIC RECORDS, TO ESTABLISH WHETHER, TO WHOM, AND WHAT PORTIONS OF A RECORDING MAY BE DISCLOSED OR A COPY RELEASED, TO ESTABLISH THE PROCEDURE FOR CONTESTING A REFUSAL TO DISCLOSE A RECORDING OR TO OBTAIN A COPY OF A RECORDING, TO DIRECT STATE OR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO PROVIDE, UPON REQUEST, ACCESS TO A METHOD TO VIEW AND ANALYZE RECORDINGS TO THE STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE North Carolina STATE CRIME LABORATORY…
House Bill 972 became North Carolina’s new law addressing the public disclosure of recordings made by law enforcement as of October 1, 2016.
What Constitutes a Recording Under North Carolina Law?
A recording is defined as “a visual, audio, or visual and audio recording captured by a body-worn camera, a dashboard camera, or any other video or audio recording device operated by or on behalf of a law enforcement agency or law enforcement agency personnel when carrying out law enforcement responsibilities. This term does not include any video or audio recordings of interviews regarding agency internal investigations or interviews or interrogations of suspects or witnesses.” N.C.G.S. 132-1.4A (6).
Who Can Request A Recording?
The recording will be released only to 1) the subject whose image or voice is captured in the recording; or 2) a personal representative of an adult person (who must consent to the release of the recording) whose image or voice was captured in the recording; or 3) a personal representative of a minor, or an adult person who is under lawful guardianship, and whose image or voice is captured in the recording; or 4) a personal representative of a deceased person whose image or voice is captured in the recording; or 5) a personal representative of an adult person who is incapacitated and unable to provide consent to disclosure. § 132-1.4 (c 1-5)
How Can I Requesting a Recording?
You can send a written request to the Custodian of Records of the law enforcement agency from which you are seeking a recording from. You must include the date and time of the incident captured in the recording and/or describe the activity sufficiently enough to identify the recording you are requesting. § 132-1.4 (c) It is helpful to provide as much detail as possible.
What Happens if My Request is Denied?
Because the disclosure of body cam footage is not public record, your request very well may be denied. However, if your request is denied you can apply to the superior court in the county where any portion of the recording was made for a review of your denied request.
The court may order the disclosure of the recording only if the court finds that the law enforcement agency abused its discretion in denying the request for disclosure. The court may only order disclosure of those portions of the recording that are relevant to the person's request. A person who receives disclosure pursuant to this subsection shall not record or copy the recording. An order issued pursuant to this subsection may not order the release of the recording…
- 132-1.4 (e)
Not only is there an absence of uniformity in the laws of disclosure regarding body cam footage, there is also no uniformity amongst the various law enforcement agencies’ policies and procedures for utilizing body cams. There is a “patchwork of laws that regulates the collection and availability of such footage across the country” (Urban Institute Report, Feb. 2016).
The use of body cams has already raised legal questions concerning the 4th Amendment. In Washington State, body cam footage taken inside a private residence was released on YouTube. In 2016, Washington enacted an exemption to its Public Records Act. The exemption specifically covers body camera footage that records "[t]he interior of a place of residence where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy."
As the use of body cams in law enforcement agencies become more widespread, so will the controversy about uniformity in the policies and procedures regarding the usage and disclosure of body cam footage. The solution(s) must be balanced with public interest and the constitutional ramifications of the same.
Many times the body camera footage becomes important in car accident cases where one of the parties makes a statement against interest. In those situations the Plaintiff's lawyer needs to get the footage as soon as possible. To discuss your case please contact us. You will speak with an attorney who can discuss your case. There is no fee for an initial consultation.
Additional Car Accident Personal Injury Traffic Tickets Articles
According to the Insurance Information Institute, there are over 8 million registered motorcycles in the United States and in 2020, there were 83,000 injury accidents involving motorcycles. Over 5,000 of them tragically ended in a fatalities. It is important to know the issues surrounding motorcycle accidents and what you can do if you have been […]
The United States relies heavily on the trucking industry to get supplies and food across the country and to our stores and factories. According to the American Trucking Associations, over 4 million commercial trucks moved over 72% of America’s freight in 2021. With over 300 billion miles on the road each year, these trucks are […]
Sooner or later after a NC car accident the injured party with be contact by the insurance company. Our attorneys counsel our clients not to speak with either the negligent party’s insurance or their own. The law is extremely complicated and after decades of cases full of loopholes for the insurance companies. As such, what […]