After a collision, questions often arrive faster than answers. A person may be trying to understand a crash report, medical instructions, vehicle storage, insurance communications, missed work, expenses, and whether a legal consultation would be useful. Putting those questions in one structured register can make an initial conversation more focused without assuming that a lawyer, physician, insurer, repair facility, or public agency owns every issue.

A question register should identify the unresolved issue, why it matters to the reader, the source that may answer it, who is responsible for the next step, and whether the answer is factual, medical, insurance-related, or legal.

Separate the questions by decision owner

  • Immediate health or safety questions for an appropriate medical provider or emergency service
  • Treatment instructions, symptoms, restrictions, appointments, medications, and prognosis questions for the treating provider
  • Coverage, notice, claim number, inspection, rental, repair, storage, payment, and written-decision questions for the relevant insurer or vendor
  • Crash-report, public-record, vehicle, employment, wage, expense, communication, photograph, and video questions tied to the person or agency that holds the source
  • Legal deadlines, responsibility, evidence, insurance rights, claim scope, communications, and representation questions for a North Carolina lawyer after the lawyer has enough facts to respond

Record what is known and what remains uncertain

For each question, preserve the event date, source date, person or organization involved, exact document or message, current answer, missing fact, next request, follow-up date, and status. Distinguish a confirmed fact from a memory, estimate, assumption, prediction, or legal conclusion. A useful register makes uncertainty visible instead of filling gaps with a confident-sounding answer.

  • Confirmed: supported by an identified source that has been preserved
  • Reported: attributed to a named person, document, or organization but not independently verified
  • Estimated: a time, amount, distance, or other value that still needs a supporting method
  • Disputed: two sources provide materially different information
  • Unknown: no current source answers the question
  • Outside scope: the issue belongs with a medical provider, insurer, repair professional, public agency, or another decision maker

Prepare consultation questions that can be answered clearly

The North Carolina State Bar’s questions to consider before hiring a lawyer address background and experience, fees, the representation agreement, responsibility for the matter, communication, documents, and ending the relationship. Add matter-specific questions, but keep the same practical focus: who will do what, under what agreement, with which costs, and how information and decisions will be communicated.

  • What facts and records are needed before a legal assessment can be made?
  • Which questions can be addressed during this consultation, and which require additional information or a different professional?
  • Has a client-lawyer relationship begun, or is this only an initial discussion?
  • If representation is offered, what work is included, excluded, or dependent on further review?
  • Who will communicate, how often, through which channel, and how should urgent or sensitive information be handled?
  • What decisions remain with the client, and what actions may the lawyer take under the agreement?

Clarify authority and communication

North Carolina Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2 addresses the allocation of authority between a client and lawyer and permits reasonable limits on the scope of representation. A consultation request, document upload, or general conversation should not be described as a complete representation without confirming the actual agreement and scope.

Rule 1.4 addresses communication and the information needed for client decision-making. Use the question register to record decisions that require an explanation, information requested, the response received, and the next agreed step. It is a working communication aid, not proof that a particular decision or outcome is required.

Bring the questions together with the source packet

The related guide to preparing a car-accident intake packet explains how to organize records, preserve originals, identify missing items, and transmit sensitive material. The packet supplies sources; the question register explains what each source may help resolve.

Rosensteel Fleishman Car Accident & Injury Lawyers provides general information about Charlotte car-accident consultations involving unresolved legal and evidence questions. Whether representation is available and what a lawyer can assess depend on the facts, conflicts review, applicable law, and the agreed scope.

Sources