A consultation evaluates the potential claim and the proposed working relationship. Both matter. A lawyer may understand the legal issue while the offered scope, communication, staffing, cost, or timing does not fit what the client needs.

The engagement is a division of work, authority, cost, and risk that should be understood before signing.

Objectives and immediate priorities

  • What outcome is the client seeking, and which objectives may conflict?
  • Which evidence, notice, medical, insurance, or filing task cannot wait?
  • What material facts or law remain uncertain?
  • What would cause the representation plan to change?

Scope and exclusions

Determine whether the engagement includes investigation, insurance negotiation, filing, service, discovery, experts, mediation, trial, appeal, collection, lien resolution, or related matters. Identify excluded benefit, employment, property, probate, tax, criminal, family, or other issues.

Staffing, supervision, and capacity

  • The responsible lawyer, supervising lawyer, regular contact, records staff, and litigation staff
  • Current workload and ability to perform urgent preservation and ordinary development
  • Use of outside investigators, medical reviewers, technical witnesses, vendors, or co-counsel
  • Continuity plan when a lawyer or staff member is unavailable or leaves the firm

Communication expectations

State Bar Rule 1.4 addresses consultation, status, reasonable requests, and information needed for client decisions. Agree on contact method, ordinary response expectations, scheduled updates, urgent escalation, and how offers and material developments will be presented.

Evidence and client responsibilities

Identify who obtains reports, records, bills, policies, video, data, witnesses, physical evidence, work proof, and prior history. The client should know what must be preserved, what should not be altered or posted, and when medical, work, address, insurance, or contact changes must be reported.

Decision authority

  • Who decides whether to settle, file, dismiss, appeal, or accept a material term?
  • Which tactical decisions are delegated to counsel after consultation?
  • How will disagreements about strategy, expense, or timing be addressed?
  • What informed consent is needed for conflicts, joint representation, limited scope, or other material circumstances?

Fees, expenses, and net recovery

Rule 1.5 addresses fees, expenses, contingent-fee writings, and fee disputes. Request examples for no recovery, an early settlement, litigation, trial, appeal, and termination. Include case expenses, medical or benefit repayment, disputed balances, and net proceeds.

Settlement and release review

Ask how liability, causation, damages, coverage, and defenses will be evaluated; how every offer will be communicated; who calculates repayment and net proceeds; and how the complete release terms will be explained before a decision.

Conflicts and confidentiality

Confirm who the client is, whether other people or entities are jointly represented, what information can be shared, and how conflicts are checked and handled. Family involvement does not automatically make a family member the client or authorize disclosure.

Ending the relationship and transferring the file

Rule 1.16 addresses termination, withdrawal, court permission, and protecting client interests. The agreement should explain notice, outstanding work, fees and expenses, file transfer, court procedure, and responsibility during transition.

Review before signing

  • Read every agreement and incorporated policy.
  • Ask for clarification of terms that do not match the consultation.
  • Keep a signed copy and the names and contact details of assigned people.
  • Record the first deadlines, client tasks, firm tasks, and next scheduled update.

The related representation comparison guide helps evaluate scope, risk, capability, fee, expense, and net result before the engagement decision.

Rosensteel Fleishman Car Accident & Injury Lawyers provides information about personal-injury engagement terms in Charlotte and North Carolina. Written expectations make later decisions easier to evaluate.

Sources